Поиск по каталогу |
(строгое соответствие)
|
- Профессиональная
- Научно-популярная
- Художественная
- Публицистика
- Детская
- Искусство
- Хобби, семья, дом
- Спорт
- Путеводители
- Блокноты, тетради, открытки
Assessing the quality and performance of institutional review boards.
В наличии
Местонахождение: Алматы | Состояние экземпляра: новый |
Бумажная
версия
версия
Автор: Dr. Min-Fu Tsan
ISBN: 9786138826378
Год издания: 1905
Формат книги: 60×90/16 (145×215 мм)
Количество страниц: 216
Издательство: Scholars' Press
Цена: 57306 тг
Положить в корзину
Способы доставки в город Алматы * комплектация (срок до отгрузки) не более 2 рабочих дней |
Самовывоз из города Алматы (пункты самовывоза партнёра CDEK) |
Курьерская доставка CDEK из города Москва |
Доставка Почтой России из города Москва |
Аннотация: Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a pivotal role in protecting human subjects participating in research. While IRBs were established for the primary purpose of protecting human subjects, nearly five decades later there has been no empirical evidence demonstrating that IRBs in fact protect human research subjects. This is because IRB oversight alone is insufficient in protecting human subjects. In addition to IRBs, investigators, institutions, research participants, research sponsors, and the Federal government all share responsibilities for protecting human subjects. In the United States, IRBs carry out their mission of protecting human research subjects through implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule. Here I propose that the quality of IRBs be defined as how well they implement the Common Rule and present examples of measuring IRB quality and performance so defined that lead to quality improvements. Based on this definition, the quality of IRB reviews and IRB decisions can also be defined that are quantifiable and measurable, allowing future assessment and improvement of these important IRB qualities.
Ключевые слова: institutional review board, human subjects protection, Quality, Performance Measurement, quality improvement.